|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Searcher
Surpass Staff
Joined in May 2003
Lives in Orlando
24,509 posts
Gave thanks: 936
Thanked 787 times
|
And makes for unhappiness! At least these donuts are by my side.
__________________
Follow Surpass on Twitter and Facebook
Check out interesting finds on the Surpass Blog .... it's coming. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Surpass Fan
Seasoned Poster
Joined in Feb 2007
Lives in Maine
Hosted on SH110
40 posts
Gave thanks: 3
Thanked 3 times
|
Kayla, I recommend using an unordered list for those links. Tables are for tabular data, even if it is just for testing. In other words, I agree with Mr. H.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Searcher
Surpass Staff
Joined in May 2003
Lives in Orlando
24,509 posts
Gave thanks: 936
Thanked 787 times
|
I'm glad you brought this thread back up - I need to get to work on that, seriously.
![]()
__________________
Follow Surpass on Twitter and Facebook
Check out interesting finds on the Surpass Blog .... it's coming. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Comfy Contributor
Joined in Aug 2006
Hosted on SH103
100 posts
Gave thanks: 2
Thanked 4 times
|
Hmm, I don't know, I'm going to take a stab in the dark and hope no one's face is there.
I used to have a similar problem but it was on IE, and I thought it was an IE specific issue. I went about it by specifying a really small font size, 1px or so, in the elements that were getting unnecessary padding. Even though there was no text in the div/table cell, something was stretching them, and it was fixed by simply doing that. OK, I decided to test it, in the <table> with the dedimain images I put in a "style="font-size: 0px;" ", it decreased the gap to 1px high which is smaller than it was before, but no, it didn't completely eliminate it. What I'm saying is that it did do something so try playing with that. Personally I'd simply try to avoid using tables, go with a div and display the images in a block, or something along those lines. EDIT: Ok, I tried the div with "display: block;" thing... still doesn't remove the gap completely.. scratching my head right now... Last edited by meephead; February 5th, 2007 at 10:35 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Searcher
Surpass Staff
Joined in May 2003
Lives in Orlando
24,509 posts
Gave thanks: 936
Thanked 787 times
|
Yes.. I wanted to actually figure it out though - because even if it's dirty and wrong, there should still be a way to make it work.
Thanks for trying! I guess we can put this issue away into the depths of the unknown.
__________________
Follow Surpass on Twitter and Facebook
Check out interesting finds on the Surpass Blog .... it's coming. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Comfy Contributor
Joined in Aug 2006
Hosted on SH103
100 posts
Gave thanks: 2
Thanked 4 times
|
I just googled, only found cheats like setting negative margins to get rid of that gap. And if it came to that I'd rather make the text into gifs with transparencies and have the background be a single image without the text. A small gap like that shouldn't cause any visual problems in that case.
Apparently it's frustrating a lot of people: Quote:
|
|
|
|
|