| Email General questions, webmail, mailing lists. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Fresh Surpasser
Joined in Sep 2005
25 posts
Gave thanks: 1
Thanked 0 times
|
Someone has been forging my e-mail!
Today I woke up to find out that hundreds of spam e-mail have been sent from my domain name! Even though I have never sent a single e-mail! Clearly my e-mail is being forged. What can I do?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Comfy Contributor
Joined in Sep 2007
Lives in ~root
111 posts
Gave thanks: 1
Thanked 12 times
|
Have support create an spf record for you
http://openspf.org http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-mail_spoofing
__________________
I'm proud to say I never have and never will use vista |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Web Hosting Super Ninj4
Super #1
Joined in Sep 2003
Lives in Fullerton, CA
1,581 posts
Gave thanks: 0
Thanked 2 times
|
Unfortunately there's not a whole lot you can do. I'd highly recommend removing your email addresses from your websites (if they're present) or enabling a WHOIS privacy service on your domain registration to hide your email address, if possible. These two ways are where spammers get to harvest the most email addresses to send spam to and make it look like spam is coming from.
SPF records are a good option in theory, but not in practice. They're literally useless. Both mail servers involved in the transaction of email must be using SPF and have it enabled/configured correctly. It's a very good chance that the mail servers spammers are using (usually just compromised (with viruses) PCs) or mail servers they've set up specifically for spamming. Wouldn't make sense for them to set up SPF on either of those! Without SPF being enabled both on the sending and receiving machines, it's rendered completely useless for that mail transaction. I honestly wouldn't waste your time writing out a ticket. You won't see it reduce the spam you receive at all nor will it stop any spammer that's not using a legitimate email service (like Gmail) from sending spam "from" your domain. Just take my two suggestions above and once your address/domain falls off the spammers lists you shouldn't see any more forged emails coming to you. They cycle through lists every so often as their robots harvest more addresses and domains to "use". I hope that helps/enlightens! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Seasoned Poster
Joined in May 2006
59 posts
Gave thanks: 6
Thanked 0 times
|
I have the same problem. It's not spam coming to me, it's spam coming "from" my domains. I get about 150 spame emails a day, but Mail from Apple filters most (98%) of it out. Is there a way to turn authentication on or turn off the outgoing mail server? I have to use my ISP for outgoing mail.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Web Hosting Super Ninj4
Super #1
Joined in Sep 2003
Lives in Fullerton, CA
1,581 posts
Gave thanks: 0
Thanked 2 times
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Staff of Surpass
Super #1
Joined in Apr 2007
2,747 posts
Gave thanks: 154
Thanked 187 times
|
Quote:
yourdomain.com and random names like that?If this is the case you have the default e-mail address set to your address and need to change it to :fail: in cpanel that should stop those kind of e-mail from reaching you 100%
__________________
D4nz Net - Surpass Help Desk - NES Forever Use the thanks button. It works! AIM: dansorl |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Comfy Contributor
Joined in Sep 2007
Lives in ~root
111 posts
Gave thanks: 1
Thanked 12 times
|
Quote:
I'm not sure you fully know what you are talking about. 1- It doesn't matter if the email address is on the website or on the whois, k10magic isn't referring to spam being sent to her domain but bounce backs of spoofed emails. These can be randomly generated for any domain 2- An SPF record does work a good amount of the time and saying not to create it at all makes no sense. I agree with Dan in saying to set catch-all to fail because you will not receive the bounce backs. In theory anyone can spoof an email address by setting up your email client to use these email settings except for a different outgoing server. Yes spammers will never be stopped but saying to change your whois does nothing, telling them to create an SPF record which is designed to prevent this may actually make a difference Oh and most servers do comply with SPF records. Spammers within the past 5 years have switched to rooted servers to send spam usually. This was done because them purchasing servers was leaving a paper trail and they are easy to shut down.
__________________
I'm proud to say I never have and never will use vista |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
I love Spicy!
Excelling Contributor
Joined in Jun 2007
Lives in O-t0wn, Flowda
703 posts
Gave thanks: 27
Thanked 44 times
|
mailicous users that send spam will simply forge (spoof) your email address so that when they send spam, and it is picked up by a server as spam and bounces back, instead of them getting it back it is delivered to the spoofed address.
If your default address is set to your username or a valid email address on your account, you will receive these messages as the default address serves purpose to receive all 'unrouteable emails'. By setting your default address to :fail: No Such User Here, your account will not accept unrouted emails and will only permit emails to VALID accounts in your cPanel.
__________________
Sauce 'em up Surpass Style! <=== Meet Bonzai, my fish.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |||
|
Web Hosting Super Ninj4
Super #1
Joined in Sep 2003
Lives in Fullerton, CA
1,581 posts
Gave thanks: 0
Thanked 2 times
|
Quote:
Quote:
Believe me, I've got professional experience with dealing with issues like this and I've *never* seen SPF correct this issue when it's been used. Prove me wrong, please, because I'd really like to love SPF. It's a great idea. Quote:
Using a throwaway email address or a whois privacy service helps with this. I'm sorry that you're not able to understand that. Most servers may "comply" with them (as in be capable of support SPF) but hardly "most" actually use it. If you have data that shows otherwise, I'd be happy to see it! |
|||
|
|
|