mobius

Not that it bothers me, i've just seen other posts where kayla asked people...

__________________

bassdaddy777

I don't see anything in the rules about it, but large pics that are really just "notice me" images aren't that friendly to people on dial-up.

__________________
Bronze Reseller
Pass36

mobius

Poor imsleepy has to get every single image by dogsled... must take forever :cry3:

__________________

yahooadam

well i didnt think these were oversized

and i use em on lots of forums

so i thought theyd be ok

and its nice to easilly be able to tell ure post from another

thats why i like sigs

Bigjohn

The graphics in your SIG alone are over 375KB !

D-a-m=n to anyone trying to read this thread via dialup!!

John

__________________
Proud to be a Surmunity Mod!
XEON PASS60 PASS61
Make a fundamental difference!
My Sites:
Curious about Brewing Beer? Join the community!
>>>>> Some Change is GOOD! Keep your paycheck! Support the Fair Tax
Get into an Art museum
Victorian London
It's your brain -ON WEB - mybrainhost.com (under development)
What SHOULD Government do? Much Less than it Does!

AllanC

now I know... I view this thread at home since im using dial-up and take me forever this page to load... :grrr:

I think smaller than 375KB images would be fine for us... specially US! :bottomlin (dialup) :grrr: :grrr: :mad3:

__________________

H

Signatures are fine and dandy for putting a link or a quote.. Maybe even an image, but to me your signature is a little space invasive. They do look quite great, but yeah... File size and the ammount of pixels they take is quite hefty for most people. The load time really isn't a problem on my cable connection, but that's over 2 1/2 minutes of loading time for a dial-up user.

I'm not suggesting that Surpass do this, but I know of forums (Trillian.cc for example) that limit both the size of the signature, and the file size of the signature. Perhaps there could be a courtesy suggestion as to what is more appropriate for dial-up users.