| PHP, MySQL General PHP questions. Or go to our PHPsuexec Forum >> |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Insanely
Super #1
Joined in Jul 2005
Lives in Northwest USA
4,154 posts
Gave thanks: 39
Thanked 78 times
|
I'm playing with the idea of putting up a image gallery. Duel purpose for personal use and for some family and friends to share images and pics. Not really sure just how big but small to start for sure.
What are the pros and cons of having a image gallery use a the data base (MySQL) verses not using it. I am looking at these so far. Those that use the DB Coppermine Gallery 2 WEBalbum Those that do not use the DB SPGM (Simple Picture Gallery Manager) MG2 DAlbum I've never messed with a image gallery so totally new to me. Looking at something simple but not to limited to where a small comment can be posted with the image and maybe make different pages like one for me and another for my brother an so forth.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
is scientific.
Resident.
Joined in Mar 2004
Lives in fear of Obama.
Hosted on Pass 7
13,117 posts
Gave thanks: 8
Thanked 34 times
|
I'm not really sure what the pros and cons would be of the information storage vs. the pros and cons of the software itself. Personally, I prefer Coppermine. Gallery is a great on as well. They are both pretty easy to use.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
All Ur Base R Belong 2 Us
Excelling Contributor
Joined in Feb 2005
Lives in Vegas & New York
824 posts
Gave thanks: 2
Thanked 6 times
|
Databases tend to carry overhead for making connections, and if you choose persistent connections to avoid the continuous connection making, too much traffic could result in you reaching the limit the database is set on number of connections. Generally this isn't much a problem though, unless it gets a decent amount of traffic volume.
__________________
Nobody doing nothing |
|
|
|