icon Learn how to get the most out of Surmunity - read our forum tips here! | Welcome! Please register to access all of our features.

» Surpass Web Hosting Forums » Discussions » Private Hosting » Mount FTP Connection?

Private Hosting Questions about VPS, dedicated servers and colocation.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old April 4th, 2008, 4:14 PM   #1 (permalink)
DemonicAngel
Super #1
 
twirp's Avatar
 
Joined in Aug 2004
Lives in Wherever The World Takes Me
Hosted on Pass76
1,769 posts
Gave thanks: 24
Thanked 32 times
Mount FTP Connection?

'alo!
If I mount an FTP connection as a network drive or whatever it's called, will it eat up bandwidth? Or will it only start taking bandwidth when I start downloading folder lists and the item itself? And, what uses less bandwidth if I do mount something, sftp or ftp?
Thanks
__________________
You wear Vans so high school kids will think that you can skate. He wears Vans because he can skate. TwiRp wears Vans because they were on sale. Pass76 wants Vans.
twirp is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old April 4th, 2008, 4:59 PM   #2 (permalink)
Sysadmin
Seasoned Poster
 
Daniel's Avatar
 
Joined in Feb 2005
71 posts
Gave thanks: 0
Thanked 42 times
Hai,

Mounting FTP as a network drive really shouldn't affect your bandwidth usage at all while sitting idle. Although I am not positive on the inner workings of how Windows accomplishes this, it'd be silly if it attempted to keep some sort of an active state connectivity with the FTP server while it's not in use.

As to what would use more bandwidth - it'd be sftp (encapsulation, encryption vs all plain text), but again, the difference is so minimal that you would barely notice any difference. Instead of looking at it, as to what uses less bandwidth in this scenario, it should be looked at from the 'what is more secure' perspective.

Choose sftp if you can, but I think for Windows, you'd need to buy some sort of additional software to get this accomplished as there's no native 'ssh' capabilities in Windows.
Daniel is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
This user thanks Daniel for this great post!
twirp (April 4th, 2008)
Old April 4th, 2008, 4:59 PM   #3 (permalink)
Surpass Developer
On a golden path...
 
Mark's Avatar
 
Joined in Jan 2004
Lives in Florida
Hosted on decc.surpasshosting.com
396 posts
Gave thanks: 10
Thanked 68 times
Bandwidth usage would be negligible either way to keep a connection alive. As to which uses more, I don't really know to be honest because it would all depend on where the encryption/decryption takes place in regards to the bandwidth count, but I can't imagine it would use an amount to where you would notice
__________________
Mark
Surpass Hosting Developer
sɹnoʎ uɐɥʇ ɹǝʇʇǝq sı bıs ʎɯ
Mark is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
This user thanks Mark for this great post!
twirp (April 4th, 2008)
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On