icon Get the most out of Surmunity, read our tips here! Need an interesting blog to read? You've got to read the Surpass Blog! | Welcome! Please register to access all of our features.

» Surpass Web Hosting Forums » Discussions » Private Hosting » Thinking in get a dedicated

Private Hosting Questions about VPS, dedicated servers and colocation.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old November 12th, 2004, 8:35 AM   #1 (permalink)
Surpass Fan
Comfy Contributor
 
mayorwinters's Avatar
 
Joined in Apr 2004
Lives in Spain
Hosted on pass6
133 posts
Gave thanks: 0
Thanked 0 times
Thinking in get a dedicated

Hello. We are thinking in get a dedicated. We don't have lots of webs hosted. For a number of 50 webs, more or less, could be sufficient a celeron 1700?
Some of them use data bases.

Thanks.
__________________
domain: www.seicom.es
server: pass6


Regards from Spain (MAYOR WINTERS -- MAJOR WINTERS -- BAND OF BROTHERS)
mayorwinters is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old November 12th, 2004, 8:37 AM   #2 (permalink)
minor deity
Super #1
 
Bigjohn's Avatar
 
Joined in Apr 2004
Lives in Georgia
Hosted on XEON
7,394 posts
Gave thanks: 28
Thanked 94 times
Hola Major.

You could start with a Celeron, but I would not recommend it.

Start with the P IV - single CPU. Then you can add more CPU and RAM if needed.

A Celeron would be fine for just servicing static web pages, but not for a lot of database activity... it would just not work well for you.
__________________
Proud to be a Surmunity Mod!
XEON PASS60 PASS61
Make a fundamental difference!
My Sites:
Curious about Brewing Beer? Join the community!
>>>>> Some Change is GOOD! Keep your paycheck! Support the Fair Tax
Get into an Art museum
Victorian London
It's your brain -ON WEB - mybrainhost.com (under development)
What SHOULD Government do? Much Less than it Does!
Bigjohn is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old November 12th, 2004, 8:46 AM   #3 (permalink)
Forum Moderator
Super #1
 
Ehaanaes's Avatar
 
Joined in Aug 2003
Lives in Norway
Hosted on Minerva
1,215 posts
Gave thanks: 0
Thanked 0 times
Yep. I have like 50 sites or so to be moved over to my server.
I started with Pentium IV right away. It's WAY better than the celeron

Not that much more expensive anyway.
__________________
Owner of Minerva and Server :: Beatiful P4's Surpass
http://www.case-spider.com
Winner of the Surpassies 2004 - Most Spirit. :bravo:
Google = Friend!
Ehaanaes is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old November 12th, 2004, 11:46 AM   #4 (permalink)
Surpass Fan
On a golden path...
 
DiscJockey's Avatar
 
Joined in Jul 2004
Hosted on Pass20
422 posts
Gave thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
i aint too much expert on computer RAM and processor things but just got a question

Intel Dual Xeon 2.4Ghz
Intel Pentium IV 2.4Ghz 533Mhz
AMD Athlon 2.4Ghz

they all 2.4Ghz right? is there any other differences im them? why does the prices vary when they all the same
__________________
:P
DiscJockey is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old November 12th, 2004, 1:04 PM   #5 (permalink)
Surpass Fan
On a golden path...
 
Joined in Nov 2003
432 posts
Gave thanks: 0
Thanked 0 times
I'm not an expert, but I believe it involves the number and how the processing is done. Of course, speed is important, but it's only part of the story. A dual Xeon 2.4 Ghz would have twice the processing capacity of a single processor with the same speed. The Pentium, if I'm not mistaken, can process more than the Athlon. You can throw Celeron into the mix as well and I think it has slightly less processing capacity than the Athlon.

Quote:
A Celeron would be fine for just servicing static web pages, but not for a lot of database activity... it would just not work well for you.
I think this statement is a little extreme. The Celeron will handle database activity, but will load down faster than the Athlon, which will load down faster than the Pentium. I don't believe your performance will be twice as good going from a Athlon to a Pentium. You could do a search on the processors and find some statistics, and get some reliable numbers, but the bottom line is really how many accounts/sites you want to put on a server. It seems like most hosts will load them until the CPU load is constantly high and outages occur, before they start moving accounts/sites to another server.
__________________
Fw Web Solutions
http://fwwebs.com
fwwebs5 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On